2015 Final
1. Rowan County (17-3-6)
2. Bishop Brossart (14-10)
3. Bourbon County (17-2-3)
4. Campbell County (15-8-1)
5. Russell (14-3-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-12-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (12-10-2)
8. East Carter (9-8-4)
9. Harrison County (10-7)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Mason County (10-9), Greenup County (6-6-1), Bath County (12-8-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 11 (Oct. 26-Nov. 1)
1. Rowan County (17-3-6)
2. Bishop Brossart (14-10)
3. Bourbon County (17-2-3)
4. Campbell County (15-8-1)
5. Russell (14-3-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-12-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (12-10-2)
8. East Carter (9-8-4)
9. Harrison County (10-7)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Mason County (10-9), Greenup County (6-6-1), Bath County (12-8-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 10 (Oct. 19-25)
1. Rowan County (16-2-6)
2. Bishop Brossart (14-9)
3. Bourbon County (17-2-3)
4. Campbell County (15-8-1)
5. Russell (14-3-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-12-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (12-10-2)
8. East Carter (9-8-4)
9. Harrison County (10-7)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Mason County (10-9), Greenup County (6-6-1), Bath County (12-8-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 9 (Oct. 12-18)
1. Bourbon County (17-1-3)
2. Rowan County (13-2-6)
3. Campbell County (13-7-1)
4. Bishop Brossart (11-9)
5. Russell (14-2-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-11-1)
7. Harrison County (10-6)
8. Ashland Blazer (10-9-2)
9. East Carter (9-7-4)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (6-6-1), Mason County (10-8), Bath County (12-7-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 8 (Oct. 5-11)
1. Bourbon County (16-1-3)
2. Rowan County (11-2-6)
3. Campbell County (11-7-1)
4. Bishop Brossart (10-8)
5. Russell (13-2-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-10-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (9-8-2)
8. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
9. East Carter (7-7-4)
10. Harrison County (8-6)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (6-5-1), Mason County (9-7), Scott (8-11-1), Boyd County (6-9-5), Bath County (11-6-2).
Week 7 (Sep. 28-Oct. 4)
1. Bourbon County (15-1-1)
2. Rowan County (9-2-6)
3. Russell (11-1-2)
4. Campbell County (10-7)
5. George Rogers Clark (7-9-1)
6. Bishop Brossart (8-8)
7. Montgomery County (8-5-3)
8. East Carter (6-5-4)
9. Harrison County (8-5)
10. Ashland Blazer (7-8-2)
Also considered (in order): Scott (7-10-1), Boyd County (5-9-5), Mason County (7-7), Bath County (10-6).
Week 6 (Sep. 21-27)
1. Bourbon County (13-1-1)
2. Rowan County (7-2-6)
3. Russell (11-1-1)
4. Bishop Brossart (7-6)
5. George Rogers Clark (5-8-1)
6. Campbell County (9-6)
7. Harrison County (7-4)
8. Montgomery County (7-4-2)
9. Scott (7-8-1)
10. Ashland Blazer (6-7-2)
Also considered (in order): Boyd County (4-8-4), Mason County (6-7), East Carter (4-5-3).
Week 5 (Sep. 14-20)
1. Bourbon County (11-1-1)
2. Rowan County (5-2-6)
3. Bishop Brossart (7-5)
4. Russell (9-1-1)
5. George Rogers Clark (4-7-1)
6. Campbell County (9-4)
7. Harrison County (6-3)
8. Montgomery County (6-3-3)
9. Scott (6-8)
10. Ashland Blazer (6-5-2)
Also considered (in order): Boyd County (3-6-4).
Week 4 (Sep. 7-13)
1. Bourbon County (9-1-1)
2. Bishop Brossart (7-3)
3. Campbell County (8-3)
4. Russell (7-0-1)
5. George Rogers Clark (4-4-1)
6. Harrison County (5-2)
7. Rowan County (3-2-4)
8. Scott (5-7)
9. Ashland Blazer (5-4-2)
10. Montgomery County (4-2-2)
Also considered (in order): Boyd (3-5-3).
Week 3 (Aug. 31-Sep. 6)
1. Bourbon County (9-1-1)
2. Bishop Brossart (5-3)
3. Campbell County (5-3)
4. Harrison County (4-2)
5. Rowan County (2-0-4)
6. Russell (4-0-1)
7. George Rogers Clark (3-3-1)
8. Bath County (7-2)
9. Ashland Blazer (4-4-2)
10. Montgomery County (2-2-2)
Also considered (in order): Calvary (3-4-1), Boyd (2-3-3).
Week 2 (Aug. 24-30)
1. Bourbon County (5-1)
2. Russell (4-0)
3. Bishop Brossart (3-2)
4. Campbell County (4-2)
5. Rowan County (2-0-2)
6. Montgomery County (2-1-1)
7. George Rogers Clark (1-2)
8. East Carter (1-2-1)
9. Ashland Blazer (3-2-1)
10. Harrison County (2-2)
Also considered (in order): Menifee County (3-1).
Week 1 (Aug. 17-23)
1. Campbell County (2-1)
2. Bourbon County (2-0)
3: Ashland Blazer (3-0)
4. Russell (1-0)
5. Rowan County (1-0)
6. George Rogers Clark (1-2)
7. Harrison County (2-0)
8. Montgomery County (0-1-1)
9. Bishop Brossart (1-2)
10. Fleming County (1-0)
Also considered (in order): East Carter (0-2), Scott (0-2).
2015 Preseason
1. Campbell County (18-6-1) – Fifteen players return from the 10th Region runners-up. Depth should again be an asset for the 2015 Lady Camels. Last season, 17 players saw action in at least 21 of the team’s 25 games, with 12 registering at least one point. Twelve of those who played major minutes, eight of whom scored or assisted on a goal, are back. Expected to lead the balanced attack is forward Haley Gerdardstein, and midfielders Kelsey Riley, Natalie Fausz and Stephanie Szovati. Holly Schwarber, Becca Cline, Hadley Schumacher and Alyson Kuper bolster a back line that allowed a maximum of one goal in 18 games last fall. The biggest question for this year’s team will be who replaces three-year starting goalkeeper Bryanna Schroers.
2. Bourbon County (19-4-1)
3. George Rogers Clark (15-5-1)
4. Russell (17-5-0)
5. Rowan County (15-7-1)
6. Bishop Brossart (13-8-1)
7. East Carter (12-4-1)
8. Harrison County (10-8-1)
9. Pendleton County (13-8-0)
10: Ashland Blazer (12-9-0)
Also considered (in order): Fleming County (10-9-0), West Carter (12-8-2), Montgomery County (6-9-3).
2014 Final
1. Russell (17-5)
2. Campbell County (18-6-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (13-8-1)
4. George Rogers Clark (15-5-1)
5. Rowan County (15-7-1)
6. Ashland Blazer (12-9)
7. East Carter (12-4-1)
8. Pendleton County (13-8)
9. Harrison County (10-8-1)
10. Bourbon County (19-4-1)
Honorable mention: Montgomery County (6-9-3), West Carter (12-8-2), Mason County (12-4).
1. Rowan County (17-3-6)
2. Bishop Brossart (14-10)
3. Bourbon County (17-2-3)
4. Campbell County (15-8-1)
5. Russell (14-3-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-12-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (12-10-2)
8. East Carter (9-8-4)
9. Harrison County (10-7)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Mason County (10-9), Greenup County (6-6-1), Bath County (12-8-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 11 (Oct. 26-Nov. 1)
1. Rowan County (17-3-6)
2. Bishop Brossart (14-10)
3. Bourbon County (17-2-3)
4. Campbell County (15-8-1)
5. Russell (14-3-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-12-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (12-10-2)
8. East Carter (9-8-4)
9. Harrison County (10-7)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Mason County (10-9), Greenup County (6-6-1), Bath County (12-8-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 10 (Oct. 19-25)
1. Rowan County (16-2-6)
2. Bishop Brossart (14-9)
3. Bourbon County (17-2-3)
4. Campbell County (15-8-1)
5. Russell (14-3-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-12-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (12-10-2)
8. East Carter (9-8-4)
9. Harrison County (10-7)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Mason County (10-9), Greenup County (6-6-1), Bath County (12-8-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 9 (Oct. 12-18)
1. Bourbon County (17-1-3)
2. Rowan County (13-2-6)
3. Campbell County (13-7-1)
4. Bishop Brossart (11-9)
5. Russell (14-2-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-11-1)
7. Harrison County (10-6)
8. Ashland Blazer (10-9-2)
9. East Carter (9-7-4)
10. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (6-6-1), Mason County (10-8), Bath County (12-7-2), Scott (8-12-1), Boyd County (6-10-5).
Week 8 (Oct. 5-11)
1. Bourbon County (16-1-3)
2. Rowan County (11-2-6)
3. Campbell County (11-7-1)
4. Bishop Brossart (10-8)
5. Russell (13-2-2)
6. George Rogers Clark (9-10-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (9-8-2)
8. Montgomery County (8-7-4)
9. East Carter (7-7-4)
10. Harrison County (8-6)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (6-5-1), Mason County (9-7), Scott (8-11-1), Boyd County (6-9-5), Bath County (11-6-2).
Week 7 (Sep. 28-Oct. 4)
1. Bourbon County (15-1-1)
2. Rowan County (9-2-6)
3. Russell (11-1-2)
4. Campbell County (10-7)
5. George Rogers Clark (7-9-1)
6. Bishop Brossart (8-8)
7. Montgomery County (8-5-3)
8. East Carter (6-5-4)
9. Harrison County (8-5)
10. Ashland Blazer (7-8-2)
Also considered (in order): Scott (7-10-1), Boyd County (5-9-5), Mason County (7-7), Bath County (10-6).
Week 6 (Sep. 21-27)
1. Bourbon County (13-1-1)
2. Rowan County (7-2-6)
3. Russell (11-1-1)
4. Bishop Brossart (7-6)
5. George Rogers Clark (5-8-1)
6. Campbell County (9-6)
7. Harrison County (7-4)
8. Montgomery County (7-4-2)
9. Scott (7-8-1)
10. Ashland Blazer (6-7-2)
Also considered (in order): Boyd County (4-8-4), Mason County (6-7), East Carter (4-5-3).
Week 5 (Sep. 14-20)
1. Bourbon County (11-1-1)
2. Rowan County (5-2-6)
3. Bishop Brossart (7-5)
4. Russell (9-1-1)
5. George Rogers Clark (4-7-1)
6. Campbell County (9-4)
7. Harrison County (6-3)
8. Montgomery County (6-3-3)
9. Scott (6-8)
10. Ashland Blazer (6-5-2)
Also considered (in order): Boyd County (3-6-4).
Week 4 (Sep. 7-13)
1. Bourbon County (9-1-1)
2. Bishop Brossart (7-3)
3. Campbell County (8-3)
4. Russell (7-0-1)
5. George Rogers Clark (4-4-1)
6. Harrison County (5-2)
7. Rowan County (3-2-4)
8. Scott (5-7)
9. Ashland Blazer (5-4-2)
10. Montgomery County (4-2-2)
Also considered (in order): Boyd (3-5-3).
Week 3 (Aug. 31-Sep. 6)
1. Bourbon County (9-1-1)
2. Bishop Brossart (5-3)
3. Campbell County (5-3)
4. Harrison County (4-2)
5. Rowan County (2-0-4)
6. Russell (4-0-1)
7. George Rogers Clark (3-3-1)
8. Bath County (7-2)
9. Ashland Blazer (4-4-2)
10. Montgomery County (2-2-2)
Also considered (in order): Calvary (3-4-1), Boyd (2-3-3).
Week 2 (Aug. 24-30)
1. Bourbon County (5-1)
2. Russell (4-0)
3. Bishop Brossart (3-2)
4. Campbell County (4-2)
5. Rowan County (2-0-2)
6. Montgomery County (2-1-1)
7. George Rogers Clark (1-2)
8. East Carter (1-2-1)
9. Ashland Blazer (3-2-1)
10. Harrison County (2-2)
Also considered (in order): Menifee County (3-1).
Week 1 (Aug. 17-23)
1. Campbell County (2-1)
2. Bourbon County (2-0)
3: Ashland Blazer (3-0)
4. Russell (1-0)
5. Rowan County (1-0)
6. George Rogers Clark (1-2)
7. Harrison County (2-0)
8. Montgomery County (0-1-1)
9. Bishop Brossart (1-2)
10. Fleming County (1-0)
Also considered (in order): East Carter (0-2), Scott (0-2).
2015 Preseason
1. Campbell County (18-6-1) – Fifteen players return from the 10th Region runners-up. Depth should again be an asset for the 2015 Lady Camels. Last season, 17 players saw action in at least 21 of the team’s 25 games, with 12 registering at least one point. Twelve of those who played major minutes, eight of whom scored or assisted on a goal, are back. Expected to lead the balanced attack is forward Haley Gerdardstein, and midfielders Kelsey Riley, Natalie Fausz and Stephanie Szovati. Holly Schwarber, Becca Cline, Hadley Schumacher and Alyson Kuper bolster a back line that allowed a maximum of one goal in 18 games last fall. The biggest question for this year’s team will be who replaces three-year starting goalkeeper Bryanna Schroers.
2. Bourbon County (19-4-1)
3. George Rogers Clark (15-5-1)
4. Russell (17-5-0)
5. Rowan County (15-7-1)
6. Bishop Brossart (13-8-1)
7. East Carter (12-4-1)
8. Harrison County (10-8-1)
9. Pendleton County (13-8-0)
10: Ashland Blazer (12-9-0)
Also considered (in order): Fleming County (10-9-0), West Carter (12-8-2), Montgomery County (6-9-3).
2014 Final
1. Russell (17-5)
2. Campbell County (18-6-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (13-8-1)
4. George Rogers Clark (15-5-1)
5. Rowan County (15-7-1)
6. Ashland Blazer (12-9)
7. East Carter (12-4-1)
8. Pendleton County (13-8)
9. Harrison County (10-8-1)
10. Bourbon County (19-4-1)
Honorable mention: Montgomery County (6-9-3), West Carter (12-8-2), Mason County (12-4).