2015 Final
1. Montgomery County (19-3-1)
2. Rowan County (18-8-1)
3. Russell (13-6)
4. Bishop Brossart (12-3-4)
5. Campbell County (9-10-2)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Bath County (15-7-1)
8. Greenup County (10-6-1)
9. Bourbon County (12-11-2)
10. Boyd County (10-7-3)
Also considered (in order): Ashland Blazer (10-9-2), East Carter (13-7).
Week 11 (Oct. 26-Nov. 1)
1. Montgomery County (19-3-1)
2. Rowan County (18-8-1)
3. Russell (13-6)
4. Bishop Brossart (12-3-4)
5. Campbell County (9-10-2)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Bath County (15-7-1)
8. Greenup County (10-6-1)
9. Bourbon County (12-11-2)
10. Boyd County (10-7-3)
Also considered (in order): Ashland Blazer (10-9-2), East Carter (13-7).
Week 10 (Oct. 19-25)
1. Montgomery County (19-2-1)
2. Rowan County (17-7-1)
3. Russell (13-6)
4. Bishop Brossart (12-3-4)
5. Campbell County (9-10-2)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Bath County (15-7-1)
8. Greenup County (10-6-1)
9. Bourbon County (12-11-2)
10. Boyd County (10-7-3)
Week 9 (Oct. 12-18)
1. Bishop Brossart (12-2-4)
2. Montgomery County (17-2-1)
3. Russell (12-5)
4. Campbell County (8-9-2)
5. Rowan County (15-7-1)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (10-8-2)
8. Boyd County (10-7-3)
9. East Carter (13-7)
10. Bath County (14-6-1)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (9-5-1), Bourbon County (10-10-2).
Week 8 (Oct. 5-11)
1. Bishop Brossart (10-2-4)
2. Montgomery County (15-2-1)
3. Russell (11-5)
4. Campbell County (7-8-2)
5. Scott (8-6-1)
6. Boyd County (10-6-3)
7. Rowan County (13-7-1)
8. Ashland Blazer (9-7-2)
9. East Carter (13-6)
10. Bath County (13-5-1)
Also considered (in order): Harrison County (4-9-2), Bourbon County (9-9-2), Greenup County (7-5-1).
Week 7 (Sep. 28-Oct. 4)
1. Bishop Brossart (10-2-4)
2. Montgomery County (13-2-1)
3. Russell (10-4)
4. Scott (8-5-1)
5. Boyd County (9-5-3)
6. East Carter (12-5)
7. Rowan County (10-6-1)
8. Campbell County (4-8-2)
9. Ashland Blazer (7-7-2)
10. Bath County (10-5-1)
Also considered (in order): Harrison County (4-8-1), Greenup County (5-4-1).
Week 6 (Sep. 21-27)
1. Bishop Brossart (10-2-3)
2. Montgomery County (12-2-1)
3. Russell (10-3)
4. East Carter (10-4)
5. Scott (7-4-1)
6. Boyd County (6-4-3)
7. Campbell County (4-5-2)
8. Ashland Blazer (7-7-2)
9. Rowan County (9-5)
10. Bath County (9-5-1)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (5-4-1), Calvary Christian (6-6-1), Bourbon County (6-7-2).
Week 5 (Sep. 14-20)
1. Bishop Brossart (7-1-3)
2. Montgomery County (10-2-1)
3. East Carter (9-4)
4. Russell (8-3)
5. Scott (6-3-1)
6. Boyd County (6-3-2)
7. Rowan County (8-4)
8. Ashland Blazer (6-6-1)
9. Bath County (6-4-1)
10. Greenup County (4-4-1)
Also considered (in order): George Rogers Clark (5-7-2), Mason County (5-4-1), Pendleton County (4-6-2), Campbell County (3-5-2), Calvary Christian (4-6-1).
Week 4 (Sep. 7-13)
1. Bishop Brossart (6-1-3)
2. Montgomery County (8-2-1)
3. Russell (6-2)
4. Scott (5-2-1)
5. East Carter (6-3)
6. Bourbon County (5-2-1)
7. Bath County (5-2-1)
8. Boyd County (4-3-2)
9. Rowan County (5-2)
10. George Rogers Clark (5-5-2)
Also considered (in order): Calvary Christian (4-5), Ashland Blazer (4-3-1), Pendleton County (3-4-1), Greenup County (3-3-1).
Week 3 (Aug. 31-Sep. 6)
1. Montgomery County (6-1-1)
2. Scott (5-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (5-1-2)
4. Russell (5-2)
5. East Carter (5-3)
6. Boyd County (3-1-2)
7. Rowan County (5-1)
8. Bourbon County (4-2)
9. Bath County (5-2-1)
10. Pendleton County (3-3-1)
Also considered (in order): Ashland Blazer (3-3-1), George Rogers Clark (3-3-2), Greenup County (2-3-1), Calvary Christian (4-3).
Week 2 (Aug. 24-30)
1. Montgomery County (4-0-1)
2. Scott (3-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (2-1-2)
4. Rowan County (4-0)
5. Boyd County (3-0-1)
6. Russell (3-2)
7. Bourbon County (3-1)
8. Ashland Blazer (2-2)
9. Bath County (2-1-1)
10. Pendleton County (2-1-1)
Also considered (in order): East Carter (1-3).
Week 1 (Aug. 17-23)
1. Montgomery County (2-0)
2. Scott (2-0)
3. George Rogers Clark (1-1-1)
4. Boyd County (2-0)
5. Russell (2-1)
6. Ashland Blazer (1-1)
7. Bath County (2-0)
8. Calvary Christian (3-0)
9. Pendleton County (2-1)
10. Bishop Brossart (0-1-1)
Also considered (in order): Rowan County (2-0), Campbell County (0-2), East Carter (0-2), Harrison County (1-1), Mason County (2-0).
2015 Preseason
1. Montgomery County (20-3-1) – The Indians get the nod over defending state semifinalist Scott due to their large amount of returning scoring. Montgomery County brings back two top offensive standouts in forward Alex Shkrabba (22 goals and seven assists) and midfielder Caswell Fuller (15 goals and 19 assists), while Scott loses 59 of its 96 goals from a pair of scoring threats. Four other key players return to bolster the Indians’ midfield and defense. Eleven players graduated off last year’s team, among the most notable being goalkeeper Hunter Cole. Finding a replacement for Cole and his 0.71 goals against average will be critical to the Indians’ success.
2. Scott (21-3-1)
3. Rowan County (18-6-1)
4. East Carter (15-3-1)
5. Bishop Brossart (15-6-1)
6. Boyd County (14-5-2)
7. Ashland Blazer (8-11-1)
8. George Rogers Clark (8-11)
9. Bath County (15-7)
10. Pendleton County (5-18)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (5-10-2), Harrison County (7-10-1), Paris (8-11-1).
2014 Final
1. Scott (21-3-1)
2. Montgomery County (20-3-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (15-6-1)
4. Rowan County (18-6-1)
5. East Carter (15-3-1)
6. Boyd County (14-5-2)
7. Ashland Blazer (8-11-1)
8. Campbell County (8-8-4)
9. George Rogers Clark (8-11)
10. Bath County (15-7)
Honorable mention: Fleming County (9-6), Paris (8-11-1), Greenup County (5-10-2).
1. Montgomery County (19-3-1)
2. Rowan County (18-8-1)
3. Russell (13-6)
4. Bishop Brossart (12-3-4)
5. Campbell County (9-10-2)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Bath County (15-7-1)
8. Greenup County (10-6-1)
9. Bourbon County (12-11-2)
10. Boyd County (10-7-3)
Also considered (in order): Ashland Blazer (10-9-2), East Carter (13-7).
Week 11 (Oct. 26-Nov. 1)
1. Montgomery County (19-3-1)
2. Rowan County (18-8-1)
3. Russell (13-6)
4. Bishop Brossart (12-3-4)
5. Campbell County (9-10-2)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Bath County (15-7-1)
8. Greenup County (10-6-1)
9. Bourbon County (12-11-2)
10. Boyd County (10-7-3)
Also considered (in order): Ashland Blazer (10-9-2), East Carter (13-7).
Week 10 (Oct. 19-25)
1. Montgomery County (19-2-1)
2. Rowan County (17-7-1)
3. Russell (13-6)
4. Bishop Brossart (12-3-4)
5. Campbell County (9-10-2)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Bath County (15-7-1)
8. Greenup County (10-6-1)
9. Bourbon County (12-11-2)
10. Boyd County (10-7-3)
Week 9 (Oct. 12-18)
1. Bishop Brossart (12-2-4)
2. Montgomery County (17-2-1)
3. Russell (12-5)
4. Campbell County (8-9-2)
5. Rowan County (15-7-1)
6. Scott (8-7-1)
7. Ashland Blazer (10-8-2)
8. Boyd County (10-7-3)
9. East Carter (13-7)
10. Bath County (14-6-1)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (9-5-1), Bourbon County (10-10-2).
Week 8 (Oct. 5-11)
1. Bishop Brossart (10-2-4)
2. Montgomery County (15-2-1)
3. Russell (11-5)
4. Campbell County (7-8-2)
5. Scott (8-6-1)
6. Boyd County (10-6-3)
7. Rowan County (13-7-1)
8. Ashland Blazer (9-7-2)
9. East Carter (13-6)
10. Bath County (13-5-1)
Also considered (in order): Harrison County (4-9-2), Bourbon County (9-9-2), Greenup County (7-5-1).
Week 7 (Sep. 28-Oct. 4)
1. Bishop Brossart (10-2-4)
2. Montgomery County (13-2-1)
3. Russell (10-4)
4. Scott (8-5-1)
5. Boyd County (9-5-3)
6. East Carter (12-5)
7. Rowan County (10-6-1)
8. Campbell County (4-8-2)
9. Ashland Blazer (7-7-2)
10. Bath County (10-5-1)
Also considered (in order): Harrison County (4-8-1), Greenup County (5-4-1).
Week 6 (Sep. 21-27)
1. Bishop Brossart (10-2-3)
2. Montgomery County (12-2-1)
3. Russell (10-3)
4. East Carter (10-4)
5. Scott (7-4-1)
6. Boyd County (6-4-3)
7. Campbell County (4-5-2)
8. Ashland Blazer (7-7-2)
9. Rowan County (9-5)
10. Bath County (9-5-1)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (5-4-1), Calvary Christian (6-6-1), Bourbon County (6-7-2).
Week 5 (Sep. 14-20)
1. Bishop Brossart (7-1-3)
2. Montgomery County (10-2-1)
3. East Carter (9-4)
4. Russell (8-3)
5. Scott (6-3-1)
6. Boyd County (6-3-2)
7. Rowan County (8-4)
8. Ashland Blazer (6-6-1)
9. Bath County (6-4-1)
10. Greenup County (4-4-1)
Also considered (in order): George Rogers Clark (5-7-2), Mason County (5-4-1), Pendleton County (4-6-2), Campbell County (3-5-2), Calvary Christian (4-6-1).
Week 4 (Sep. 7-13)
1. Bishop Brossart (6-1-3)
2. Montgomery County (8-2-1)
3. Russell (6-2)
4. Scott (5-2-1)
5. East Carter (6-3)
6. Bourbon County (5-2-1)
7. Bath County (5-2-1)
8. Boyd County (4-3-2)
9. Rowan County (5-2)
10. George Rogers Clark (5-5-2)
Also considered (in order): Calvary Christian (4-5), Ashland Blazer (4-3-1), Pendleton County (3-4-1), Greenup County (3-3-1).
Week 3 (Aug. 31-Sep. 6)
1. Montgomery County (6-1-1)
2. Scott (5-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (5-1-2)
4. Russell (5-2)
5. East Carter (5-3)
6. Boyd County (3-1-2)
7. Rowan County (5-1)
8. Bourbon County (4-2)
9. Bath County (5-2-1)
10. Pendleton County (3-3-1)
Also considered (in order): Ashland Blazer (3-3-1), George Rogers Clark (3-3-2), Greenup County (2-3-1), Calvary Christian (4-3).
Week 2 (Aug. 24-30)
1. Montgomery County (4-0-1)
2. Scott (3-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (2-1-2)
4. Rowan County (4-0)
5. Boyd County (3-0-1)
6. Russell (3-2)
7. Bourbon County (3-1)
8. Ashland Blazer (2-2)
9. Bath County (2-1-1)
10. Pendleton County (2-1-1)
Also considered (in order): East Carter (1-3).
Week 1 (Aug. 17-23)
1. Montgomery County (2-0)
2. Scott (2-0)
3. George Rogers Clark (1-1-1)
4. Boyd County (2-0)
5. Russell (2-1)
6. Ashland Blazer (1-1)
7. Bath County (2-0)
8. Calvary Christian (3-0)
9. Pendleton County (2-1)
10. Bishop Brossart (0-1-1)
Also considered (in order): Rowan County (2-0), Campbell County (0-2), East Carter (0-2), Harrison County (1-1), Mason County (2-0).
2015 Preseason
1. Montgomery County (20-3-1) – The Indians get the nod over defending state semifinalist Scott due to their large amount of returning scoring. Montgomery County brings back two top offensive standouts in forward Alex Shkrabba (22 goals and seven assists) and midfielder Caswell Fuller (15 goals and 19 assists), while Scott loses 59 of its 96 goals from a pair of scoring threats. Four other key players return to bolster the Indians’ midfield and defense. Eleven players graduated off last year’s team, among the most notable being goalkeeper Hunter Cole. Finding a replacement for Cole and his 0.71 goals against average will be critical to the Indians’ success.
2. Scott (21-3-1)
3. Rowan County (18-6-1)
4. East Carter (15-3-1)
5. Bishop Brossart (15-6-1)
6. Boyd County (14-5-2)
7. Ashland Blazer (8-11-1)
8. George Rogers Clark (8-11)
9. Bath County (15-7)
10. Pendleton County (5-18)
Also considered (in order): Greenup County (5-10-2), Harrison County (7-10-1), Paris (8-11-1).
2014 Final
1. Scott (21-3-1)
2. Montgomery County (20-3-1)
3. Bishop Brossart (15-6-1)
4. Rowan County (18-6-1)
5. East Carter (15-3-1)
6. Boyd County (14-5-2)
7. Ashland Blazer (8-11-1)
8. Campbell County (8-8-4)
9. George Rogers Clark (8-11)
10. Bath County (15-7)
Honorable mention: Fleming County (9-6), Paris (8-11-1), Greenup County (5-10-2).